@eugene-chin, on 03 October 2012 - 12:57 AM, said in GTW Game 43:
That wasn't a compliment.
Of all things, your only message here so far is trying to make me think SoItBegin's charming compliment is actually an insult.
Just because you're laying low, don't think I'm not watching you.
Proposal:
SoItBegins
Techerakh
Eugene Chin - Reject 2:04 AM 10/3
Mackilroy - Reject 2:00 PM 10/3
retep998 - Reject 10:12 PM 10/2
SoItBegins - Approve 9:43 PM 10/2
Techerakh - Approve 7:18 AM 10/3
SoItBegins - Approve 9:43 PM 10/2
retep998 - Reject 10:12 PM 10/2
Eugene Chin - Reject 2:04 AM 10/2
Techerakh - Approve 7:18 AM 10/3
Mackilroy - Reject 2:00 PM 10/3
The rejects have it. Speaking of rejects, retep998, you're up next to propose a team of two. You do not get to draw a card since you are not the first leader of a round.
First my thoughts on who to decide (from IRC)
Quote
(10/3/2012 2:38:22 PM) mrxak: retep998, you're up
(2:40:42 PM) retep998: alright
(2:41:00 PM) retep998: Going by the order of the names in your list
(2:41:08 PM) retep998: Techerakh 1
(2:41:08 PM) retep998: Eugene Chin 2
(2:41:08 PM) retep998: SoItBegins 3
(2:41:08 PM) retep998: Mackilroy 4
(2:41:14 PM) ***retep998 rolls 1 4-sided die: 1
(2:41:19 PM) retep998: Well s###
(2:41:26 PM) retep998: Looks like I'm picking Techerakh
Thus, my proposal is...
_**retep998
Techerakh**_
This post has been edited by retep998 : 03 October 2012 - 01:43 PM
Proposal:
retep998
Techerakh
Eugene Chin - Reject 4:49 AM 10/4
Mackilroy - Reject 4:40 PM 10/4
retep998 - Approve 3:36 PM 10/3
SoItBegins - Reject 8:07 PM 10/3
Techerakh - Approve 3:09 PM 10/3
Techerakh - Approve 3:09 PM 10/3
retep998 - Approve 3:36 PM 10/3
SoItBegins - Reject 8:07 PM 10/3
Eugene Chin - Reject 4:49 AM 10/4
Mackilroy - Reject 4:40 PM 10/4
The proposal is rejected. Eugene Chin, you're up next to propose a team of two. You do not get to draw a card since you are not the first leader of a round. Warning! This will be the third proposal of this round.
Alright brainiacs, in case you didn't do the math on this, this round has a two-person team. That means that if everyone opposes every team that they're not on, we will reject five teams in a row (or, who knows, maybe just four) and the traitors will win. Of course, that's what two of you want. What's everyone else's excuse?
The first round team doesn't matter. The traitors never fail the mission in the first round. Let's just put together a team and be done with it.
Gene: leave me off your team. I'll support it anyway and we can get on with this damn game.
Of course, if any of you rejectionists actually have a good reason to reject these teams, please, by all means, let's hear it. I won't hold my breath though.
People of GTW.
In order to facilitate discussion it would be nice if people would join us on IRC.
If we can have at least three people on, then we can actually discuss strategy and such.
As well, by being on the IRC 24/7, you can receive instant notifications whenever something occurs with the topic.
mrxak, Techerakh, and I are already on the IRC so join us today!
irc.ambrosia.net #mafia
(18:41:53) <mrxak> of ypu can get three people to post the same log in the topic, then it'd be allowed, but I don't count
and later
(18:45:02) <mrxak> get all five players on, and it'd be fine
(18:45:14) <mrxak> or three, and all three post duplicate logs
Anyway this rule is bogus and nonsense. It would be nice to have people in the channel for a variety of reasons though, so I do still encourage people to show up more
edit: lol what is happening with these code tags
This post has been edited by Techerakh : 04 October 2012 - 05:58 PM
For my part, I was hoping to have as many proposals on record as possible; you're right about how the active No Confidence card shifts the logic, but even if retep998 were a nihilist, we could afford to delay up to SoItBegins's proposal this mission.
Since Techerakh asked not to be on, I think I'll pick:
Eugene Chin
SoItBegins
@mrxak, on 04 October 2012 - 06:32 PM, said in GTW Game 43:
It's doing color coding for html code. Just use quote tags you noob.
ur a noob
(18:55:08) <mrxak> What's nice about the rule is I can be lazy
a lazy noob
@eugene-chin, on 04 October 2012 - 09:22 PM, said in GTW Game 43:
For my part, I was hoping to have as many proposals on record as possible; you're right about how the active No Confidence card shifts the logic, but even if retep998 were a nihilist, we could afford to delay up to SoItBegins's proposal this mission.
Yes, we could "afford" to delay one more, but what would be the point? I understand that we want to get proposals on record—but not in the first round. First round proposals/votes/teams are meaningless. I will continue to say this until proven wrong.
As promised, I am supporting this team.
Proposal:
Eugene Chin
SoItBegins
Eugene Chin - Approve 10:24 PM 10/4
Mackilroy - Approve - 12:01 PM 10/5
retep998 - Reject 1:26 AM 10/5
SoItBegins - Approve 12:10 AM 10/5
Techerakh - Approve 10:41 PM 10/4
Eugene Chin - Approve 10:24 PM 10/4
Techerakh - Approve 10:41 PM 10/4
SoItBegins - Approve 12:10 AM 10/5
retep998 - Reject 1:26 AM 10/5
Mackilroy - Approve - 12:01 PM 10/5
The proposal is approved. Eugene Chin and SoItBegins, please PM if you would like the diplomatic mission to SUCCEED or FAIL.
Sorry for not speaking up, have had a lot of homework. But this proposal seems pretty goodish.