@jacabyte, on 04 September 2012 - 10:08 PM, said in GTW 41:
Edit: You kind of cornered me, you know, because if I had chosen darth_vader over retep998 you probably would have chided me for my poor selection and then come to the conclusion that I'm a traitor who's trying to protect retep998. If I had used your mission line up that you pulled up earlier you would have taken that as a declaration of my guilt. (As it is, but no sane person is going to leave themselves out of a proposal.) Again with your McCarthyism, it's not fun to play with you when you stubbornly dog us for being "traitors" every time you draw a breath.
You expect me not to corner somebody I believe is obviously behaving in a malicious way? You've already proven your guilt, why should I give you even an inch? I said two rounds ago, I would reject any proposal that you made because of your behavior. Well, here we are, and here I am rejecting.
@retep998, on 04 September 2012 - 10:10 PM, said in GTW 41:
My rejection is surprising? Really? When I clearly state that I will absolutely reject anything without me, you still think I'd approve this? mrxak, you're really disappointing me.
Anyway, considering we just got a failed mission, I'm going to start off by rejecting Jaca's proposal and getting some more proposals/votes/discussion in.
The only thing we know for certain is that at least one of Tech, Shlim, or Eugene is a traitor. This means there's probably two traitors out of the four who weren't on the mission. So, in the mean time I'll be doing some statistics to find out what the percentages of us getting a successful mission four are.
You're right, I overestimated you. My apologizes, I will try not to do it again.
I'm glad to hear you're going to come up with more pointless and unhelpful statistics though. That will sure entertain us a little while.
@eugene-chin, on 04 September 2012 - 10:25 PM, said in GTW 41:
(EDIT) Mission results come in at 10:26, and you have a proposal out at 10:50? It's canned. I'd bet money that there's two traitors on that proposal.
Reject.
Yep.
@shlimazel, on 04 September 2012 - 10:51 PM, said in GTW 41:
(quoting manually to ninja-edit proof this post to avoid looking like an idiot if mrxak changes it)
....his mission is identical to yours, except for putting himself on the mission instead of you. To do anything else would be the suspicious act. I know I would never trust someone willing to put someone other than themselves in their place on a mission. I don't see where he's tried to ram anything through, either, he's laid out his choices and his reasons for voting that way. You yourself wanted retep on the last team, so what exactly did you mean for us to take from that third sentence? On the whole, unless I'm missing something, this post seems to have abandoned all reason and gone flying with the pigs.
The only obvious motivation I can see for this post is the fact that you are not on it. I'm disbelieving you would say that retep's strategy of voting out anything that does not have himself on it is idiotic and then proceed to vote out anything that does not have you on it, because if any action is hypocritical, that definitely is (your reason for voting out the last mission, regardless of the fact that in hindsight it was a wiser choice, fell into this category, and I assume you intend to vote out this proposal as well).
In conclusion, I more or less believed you were innocent before you made that post, mrxak, but that post made you far more suspicious in my eyes. I was uncertain about voting for this proposal due to mrxak's absence, but now I will be Accepting this proposal because of it.
You don't see where he's ramming it through? He's doing exactly what I did in round four last game, right down to including retep998 who always votes so predictably, but without the pretense of reviewing the topic first. If it wasn't Techerakh, it's certainly you.
@jacabyte, on 04 September 2012 - 11:14 PM, said in GTW 41:
Oof. Could have sworn Eugene was on the first mission. But I can assure you, I did put 24 minutes of thought into my proposal because I was certain it would get rejected. We should know better than to approve first proposal for missions by now. It wasn't canned. But while you're on my case for being negligent with my proposals and/or canning proposals, why doesn't this make mrxak suspicious for putting forward his own name sheet before the results from the third mission were in? He correctly guessed that the mission would fail, I never did.
Ah, so what you're really saying here is that you were waiting eagerly for SoItBegins to post about the failure, refreshing the page constantly so you could immediately write out your proposal before anyone could start talking about it. Right. That makes you sound much more innocent.
@eugene-chin, on 04 September 2012 - 11:55 PM, said in GTW 41:
Six already? It usually takes a day or more to get five.
Well, this is pretty open and shut, is it not? There's no way this proposal is any good. Might as well reject it quick and move on to your proposal. When we get there, I do hope you exclude JacaByte, retep998, and Techerakh. It's okay if Shlimazel is the bad guy, it will take two votes to fail this one, and at least two of the bad guys will be excluded. At this point, darth_vader is looking rather unsuspicious by comparison to some of these others.
