lobf, please bold or color your vote red. The tags are "( color=#FF0000 )( b ) ( /b )( /color )", but without spaces.
Well, my problem with jrsh92 was that he hadn't shown up yet. That is now resolved.
My vote against jrsh92 is retracted.
As for who to go for next, I was looking at JacaByte or GutlessWonder for a while:
@jacabyte, on Jan 1 2009, 03:07 PM, said in GTW Game 33:
Hmm, I'm a bit reluctant to bandwagon against jrsh92 with Eugene Chin because it'll bring hot water down on both of us if my action is interpreted incorrectly, and I don't see anybody else who'd make a good target, so I'll wait a bit and see if somebody slips. We have until tomorrow to finish voting, right mrxak?
JacaByte's stated desire about not wanting to seem like bandwagoning raised my attention,
- but it could just be trying to avoid getting lynched for no reason.
His stance against random voting could be a dictator trying to drum up support against an easy target,
- but with JacaByte it could just as easily be a genuine desire to see a better quality of voters.
The fact JacaByyte says he's looking for somebody to slip and make himself a good target could just be poor judgment.
- After all, it's the dictators who should be looking for the most easily lynched targets.
Likewise, GutlessWonder jumping on Mack could be self-defense., as he says it is.
The fact that it comes when Mack already has a vote against him could be a coincidence.
- Or, it could be a dictator protecting against a lucky shot.
The fact that he'd been tilting against JacaByte for posting without voting earlier also puts him in the crosshairs.
Between JacaByte and Gutless, I'm going to say JacaByte for now.
It's the combination of sensitivity to being seen as bandwagoning, and looking for easy targets.
I'll admit it's a bit of a hunch, but can't ignore a hunch like that.
Mackilroy: (2)
JacaByte
GutlessWonder
JacaByte: (2)
kickme
Eugene Chin
Eugene Chin: (1)
jrsh92
jrsh92: (1)
lobf (Please bold or 'redden' your vote)
GutlessWonder: (1)
Mackilroy
No Vote: (1)
Templar98921