Hmmm.
I can see how RJC's below-the-radar retraction could cause confusion (And put a bullet-hole into my theory to boot).
If the Dictator did see RJC's retraction...
... Then that's still late enough into the round to realize that RJC was going get lynched, and the Dictator should have known to re-target. darth's retraction would have had no impact on that.
So. He didn't see RJC retract his vote. Which begs the question, did he miss it because it was so inconspicuous, or because he wasn't looking at the topic?
If A), he missed it because it was easily missed, then the Dictator must have thought that a tie still existed between darth_vader and RJC Ultra, and that the round would continue long enough to either get darth lynched, or to re-target the Night-Kill.
If B), he missed it because he wasn't looking at the topic, then the Dictator must have stopped looking at the topic before the vote turned against RJC.
B) rules out Mack, me, SIB and darth... Or, it would have if it was the only possibility.
Now, considering A):
darth_vader retracted his vote against RJC shortly after RJC retracted from darth, citing that it was only in self-defense. I'm taking this to mean that darth did see RJC's retraction. If he had been a dictator, he would have known that the vote had shifted against RJC, and known to re-target the Night-Kill right then. Yet, we know that the Dictator didn't re-target.
Therefore, darth is Innocent.
Mackilroy. At the time of Mackilroy's last action, RJC Ultra was in the lead with Three (3) votes, half of our players. If Mackilroy was the dictator, then why call in the Night-Kill on a player who, at the time, looked for all the world like he was going to be lynched?
Therefore, Mackilroy is Innocent.
SoItBegins. In your own words:
@soitbegins, on Nov 24 2007, 02:25 AM, said in GTW XIII:
EDIT: Fixed a few inaccuracies. I only now noticed that RJC Ultra had retracted last round.
This does not mean that you are a Dictator. However, neither does it exonerate you.
SoItBegins remains under A).
Anon. His last visible action here was to vote against SIB, early in the round. Additionally, he has a tendency to be off the forums for extended periods. Either he's lurking while logged out, or he's just not on. He has said that he was watching the topic develop, but in the end, we don't really know.
Anon is included under B).
Eugene. I've said that I was watching the topic when things went south for RJC Ultra. Now, obviously, I can't prove that to you. At the time of my last visible action before the round ended, the vote was stuck in a three-way-tie. I even commented about it. In my defense, I will say that targeting a Night-Kill when the vote is so up-in-the-air, and further, targeting one of the players in the tie, and further, targeting the player I had just voted for, isn't exactly beneficial to an Evil Dictator. Anyone can say "I am Innocent," but obviously, you're going to have to take my words with a grain of salt. I've shown how the events that unfolded would not have made sense coming from me. I've also, I believe, exonerated darth and Mackilroy, reducing the pool of potential suspects.
(EDITx??) After going over all of this for over an hour, thinking over so many possibilities, and editing again and again, I think I'm going to have to vote for Anon now. He seems to be more likely the Dictator than SIB does.
This post has been edited by Eugene Chin : 24 November 2007 - 12:40 AM