So what constitutes a "legitimate standard" to you? You're happily using HTTP - that wasn't created by an official standards body. You're also apparently happily using HTML - that recommendation (the W3C calls their standards "recommendations") is managed by the W3C, who aren't blessed with any official standards setting status - it just so happens that people tend to follow what they say. On the other hand, you call XviD/DivX evil, whilst they are based on the MPEG4 standard, which is in fact an ISO standard.
Or do you mean something else by "legitimate standard"?