Quote
Originally posted by Joe Burnette:
**Indeed. I believe it (Foundation) has been done, or at least attempted, but I don't recall ever seeing the plug. A drawback, of course is that the main story is known, so your player would have to become involved in some sort of peripheral action rather than participating directly in the major events.
**
I have to respectfully disagree. Your logic here implies that you could not make a movie of a novel... (think about it). The issue, surely, would be not 'do you know the story?', but 'did you enjoy living the story?' And The Mule would make a truly fascinating pers.... (not to mention the fact that many of the young whipper snappers 'round these parts probably haven't discovered the utter delight that is genre defining 1940s SF )
**
Quote
Unfair? First you have to define what is fair and what is unfair - and there will always be some who disagree with whatever you decide. I am all for throwing the player a few curves now and again, for making him have to pause and think things through,
**
Quite agree - perhaps a more meaningful analogy would be a curve, compared with a beamer...
**
Quote
Sturgeon's comment can of course be applied to any genre. And to reverse your "classification" of various works, George Orwell's 1984 is usually considered social commentary but is certainly easily classifiable as science fiction. I thought I knew what you meant, but assumptions can be dangerous.
**
QED... (Oh good.. that means some of the willfully misleading stuff in the plug might just come off)
Now, a question I would appreciate your (and anyone else's) view on...
I have reached the stage where I could finish (relatively quickly) the central 'combat oriented' plotline. I have also tee'd up the, um. related (parallel?) mystery.
BUT there will have to be various side plots, diversions, red herrings, traps and general mischief making by the time it is finished.
In terms of keeping track of bits and stuff, do you think it best to crack through the central plot and back-fill the other stuff, or to try to do everything chronologically in roughly the sequence it is supposed to happen?
Gage Stryker: Oh! Yes! I thought I had the back-plot well thought through but have been surprised at how much it has developed. At this rate I might have to start making notes
------------------
(This message has been edited by Aitch (edited 03-22-2002).)