If all they're doing is updating for resolution and color, it's not going to be enough to justify a major revision number. It'll just be 1.0.11. I'm just glad that Guy did resolution fix hacks of the Windows exe some time ago. It's nice to play Nova in 1440x900 natively in fullscreen.
EDIT for explanation of revision control numbering conventions to those unfamiliar with them:
In an x.x.x version number, it basically works thusly. The first number is going to be your version number. The second is the major revision number, an the third is the minor revision number. Some numbering schemes even include a build number, as with the Second Life viewer software or ICQ. These numbers don't roll over because they're not decimals. The number at each point can go as high as there are versions, major revisions, minor revisions, an builds. A build number could also be a date, rather than just an incrementing integer.
This post has been edited by CaptJosh : 15 June 2008 - 01:34 PM