Dr. Trowel, on Mar 4 2005, 01:09 AM, said:
This had crossed my mind, too -- a Wiki could be a great idea!
I haven't had a lot of experience with Wikis, so I don't know what safeguards can be built into them that deal with data loss through acts of malice, incoherence, and stupidity, and that don't require a lot of human maintenance work.
To give an example of what can go wrong, when I checked the Wiki for the game VegaStrike a few months ago, it looked like vast swaths of not-quite-useless obsolete info had been replaced with absolutely-useless gaps in the data.
How about tying the Wiki to this (or another) web-board, so that major changes to entries have to go up for board discussion before they can be applied to the Wiki?
A different board-linking idea: creating a new Wiki entry automatically creates a board topic with the entry pasted into the first post, and the Wiki page gets an unchangable "original author" link to the board topic. Then, if later the wiki page goes through massive changes, the board topic will still show the author's original vision and will (hopefully) include discussion of what changes were made, and why.
View Post
I'm not sure how we'd go about board linking, as for now I don't think this would be affilated with Ambrosia (other than being for one of its games). So we'd have to figure out away to do this.
SpacePirate, on Mar 4 2005, 02:07 AM, said:
I'd thought that wikis tracked changes by person and what changes they made? If that's the case, you should be able to revert to an earlier state with little trouble. Limiting access is always an option, but that kinda defeats the purpose.
~ SP
View Post
If I set it up I'd use MediaWiki, which is what is used for Wikipedia. It does have a history feature.