I'm expecting a follow up post from Kauthor in regards to this, seeing as he agreed to back up my opinion on the Battle of Chak, which is indeed a thorn in this webstory's side.
Here's the fleet numbers I'll go by.
I choose to ignore the posts in which RMA and Gordontron flame one another for controlling fleets or not posting in a relatively timely enough manner (by one standard), as well as the statement that defending a home system gives you some battle advantage mentally, which goes against the training rule. Thus, I will also be counting in the only other part that matters, the matter of reinforcements. Except no reinforcements show up before the time when Gordontron posted this:
Quote
Originally posted by Gordontron on April 15, 2003:
The iggy fleet had taken the systems of Chak, Diudir, and Apert. They have not taken the planets.
But they have lost a number of ships.
Gordons fleet had moved to the system Molar.
The newly made ships, the fleet from Muid move to the Tollb system. The fleets from Dirach, and Toi moved to the Tinar system.
I choose to note that he technically agreed that Chak had been lost to the Igadzra there, but let's move on. However, the Igadzra did not take many losses. The main losses I will delineate are those of the second Battle of Chak, which I shall expound on. Thus, the second Battle of Chak involves the bulk of the initial Igadzra fleet fighting the Azdgari combined fleet.
I'm taking this as the basis for the rest of my moderation here. Red, if you want to say something about this, being as you're the battle moderator, go ahead, but I desperately want this issue resolved, and I'm doing it in such a way as I see allows for no objection from either party(seeing as RMA agreed to lose a huge portion of his entire fleet, which is hardly something Gordontron can object to, considering the following). So please, talk to me if you object to this, because I really want this resolved now. It's shameful how long we've put it off.
From this I deduce that the only serious technological advantage the Azdgari have is the jammer. The sheer number of phase turrets fielded by the Igadzra would counter the shield regenerators. Considering the sheer volume of Igadzra ships and the number of phase weapons they can field, as well as similar attributes of the Azdgari fleet, I declare that both fleets practically completely annihilated one another, leaving few total survivors. The initial Igadzra fleet in Chak was totally wiped out by the Azdgari, who in turn suffered heavy losses. The Igadzra mop up fleet then entered Chak and, with heavy losses of their own, destroyed the remaining Azdgari fleet in Chak.
Result of the Battle of Chak
Igadzra Losses: Heavy, taking into account the losses that would have been taken from the Igadzra backup fleet that would have mopped up Chak after the initial fleet was there.
200 Igazras lost
300 Aradas lost
Azdgari Losses: All
124 Azdgari Warhips
333 Azdaras
196 Azdgari Aradas
100G2 Azdaras:
Thus, the Battle(s) of Chak is declared over. From now on, IC, it will be assumed to be over from all perspectives. Both sides suffered extremely heavy losses, so I better hear some damn reasonable arguments to counter this if anyone has complaints. glares
Thank God I had time to handle this today.
I will edit this if I find something showing me my fleet tallies to be off, but I am reasonably sure they are correct. (EDIT: forgot G2 Azdaras. They're in there now.)
Regards,
Solel
------------------
All that is gold does not glitter, Not all those who wander are lost; The old that is strong does not wither, Deep roots are not reached by the frost. From the ashes a fire shall be woken, A light from the shadows shall spring; Renewed shall be blade that was broken, The crownless again shall be king.
J. R. R. Tolkien
(url="http://"http://www.ambrosiasw.com/cgi-bin/ubb/search.cgi?action=intro&default;=26")The Search Feature(/url)
(This message has been edited by Solel (edited 05-11-2003).)
(This message has been edited by Solel (edited 05-11-2003).)
(This message has been edited by Solel (edited 05-11-2003).)